Psychotic disorders not treated by Omega-3 when patents take anti-depressants and get therapy
NEURAPRO: a multi-centre RCT of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids versus placebo in young people at ultra-high risk of psychotic disorders—medium-term follow-up and clinical course
npj Schizophrenia (2018)4:11; doi:10.1038/s41537-018-0052-x
B. Nelson1,2, G. P. Amminger1,2,3, H. P. Yuen1,2, C. Markulev1,2, S. Lavoie1,2, M. R. Schafer1,3, J. A. Hartmann1,2, N. Mossaheb4,
M. Schlogelhofer , S. Smesny5,1. B. Hickie6, G. Berger7, E. Y. H. Chen8, L. de Haan9, D. H. Nieman9, M. Nordentoft10, A. Riecher-Rossler11, S. Verma12, A. Thompson1,13,14, A. R. Yung1,15,16 and P. D. McGorry1,2
📄 Download the PDF from VitaminDWiki
This study reports a medium-term follow-up of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) in ultra-high risk for psychosis (UHR) patients. Primary outcomes of interest were transition to psychosis and symptomatic and functional outcome. A secondary aim was to investigate clinical predictors of medium-term outcome. Three hundred four UHR participants were recruited across 10 specialised early psychosis services in Australia, Asia, and Europe. The intervention consisted of 1.4 g/daily of omega-3 PUFA or placebo, plus up to 20 sessions of cognitive-behavioural case management (CBCM), over the 6-month study period, with participants receiving further CBCM sessions on basis of need between months 6-12. Mean time to follow-up was 3.4 (median = 3.3; SD = 0.9) years. There was a modest increase in transitions between 12-month and medium-term follow-up (11-13%) and substantial improvement in symptoms and functioning between baseline and follow-up, with no differences between the treatment groups. Most improvement had been achieved by end of the intervention. 55% of the sample received mental health treatment between end of intervention and follow-up. Omega-3 PUFA did not provide additional benefits to good quality psychosocial intervention over the medium term. Although most improvement had been achieved by end of intervention the substantial rates of post-intervention mental health service use indicate longer-term clinical need in UHR patients. The post-intervention phase treatment or the longer-term effect of CBCM, or a combination of the two, may have contributed to maintaining the gains achieved during the intervention phase and prevented significant deterioration after this time.