Loading...
 

Is 50 ng of vitamin D too high, just right, or not enough

Overview of the controversy

  • A few governments say 10 ng is OK
  • Some governements say 20 ng is OK
  • Some governments say 30 ng is OK
  • Most experts say 40 ng is good
  • Some experts say 50 ng is much better for disease prevention
  • A few people think that > 80 ng is needed to deal with possible vitamin D restrictions due to genes
  • Some experts say 50 ng is too much
  • Some concern that >40 ng may be too much if taking some fixed chemotherapy or not adjust cofactors
  • Some experts feel 50 ng is not enough to TREAT some diseases
  • Consensus: 0 ng is bad and 30 ng is good/ok

Notional Graph of Expert Opinions of levels with Vitamin D MONOTHERAPY
see wikipage: http://www.vitamindwiki.com/tiki-index.php?page_id=1293
Note: Monotherapy just increases vitamin D levels, and rarely adjusts the cofactor intake (Ca, Mg, Vitamin K2, Omega-3, etc)

At VitaminDWiki - need 20 - 49 ng

At VitaminDWiki - 50 - 60 ng

At VitaminDWiki - need > 60 ng

At VitaminDWiki - Optimal/Treatment

At VitaminDWiki - other

Image

Some indications that >40 or >50 ng may sometimes cause some problems

Image

Image

Agreement: 50 ng is NOT TOXIC


U Shaped curve due to long follow-up time, not latitude - by Dr. Grant

The U-shaped relationship comes only from prospective studies with long follow-up times.
In my considered opinion, it is an artifact of the long follow-up time, not high latitude.

References (some of which are in VitaminDWiki)

  • Robien K, Cutler GJ, Lazovich D. Vitamin D intake and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women: the Iowa Women's Health Study. Cancer Causes Control. 2007 Sep;18(7):775-82.
  • Lim U, Freedman DM, Hollis BW, Horst RL, Purdue MP, Chatterjee N, Weinstein SJ, Morton LM, Schatzkin A, Virtamo J, Linet MS, Hartge P, Albanes D. A prospective investigation of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and risk of lymphoid cancers. Int J Cancer. 2009 Feb 15;124(4):979-86.
  • Grant WB. Effect of interval between serum draw and follow-up period on relative risk of cancer incidence with respect to 25-hydroxyvitamin D level; implications for meta-analyses and setting vitamin D guidelines, Dermato- Endocrinology, 2011 July, Aug Sept.;3(3) epub (lag) http://www.landesbioscience.com/journals/dermatoendocrinology/article/15364/
  • Grant WB. Additional strong evidence that optimal serum 25(OH)D levels are at least 75 nmol/l. Int J Epi 2011 40: 1005-1007.

Do people with Dark Skin have a lower need for vitamin D? - Controversy


Chart of Vitamin D levels vs race - April 2013

Vitamin D vs Race at is.gd/vitD_race


See also PubMed

Note: need to also search for: 100 nmol, 125 nmol, 150 nmol, 200 nmol

See also web - vitamin D test "reference range" = 20-100 ng

Increasing # of papers with Optimal or Optimum "Vitamin D" in PubMed title

Image
short URL = http://is.gd/Dlevels

Is 50 ng of vitamin D too high, just right, or not enough        

24267 visitors, last modified 14 Apr, 2017, URL:

Printer Friendly PDF this page! Follow this page for updates
This page is in the following categories

Attached files

ID Name Comment Uploaded Size Downloads
7554 Optimal end 2016.jpg admin 23 Dec, 2016 19:23 4.39 Kb 728
2898 Mercola Optimal.jpg admin 12 Aug, 2013 14:44 21.97 Kb 4953
See any problem with this page? Report it to the webmaster.