Is 50 ng of vitamin D too high, just right, or not enough

Overview of the controversy

  • Most experts say 40 ng is good
  • Some experts say 50 ng is much better for disease prevention
  • Some experts say 50 ng is too much (high latitude, black skin)
  • Concern that >40 ng may be too much if taking some chemotherapy and unable to reduce the dose taken
  • Some experts feel 50 ng is not enough to TREAT some diseases

Note: Some people need even more vitamin D
   (blood levels of Vitamin D DO NOT indicate when more is needed)

All items in category Optimum Vitamin D 60 items

Notional Graph of Expert Opinions of levels with Vitamin D MONOTHERAPY

Monotherapy just increases vitamin D levels, and rarely alters the cofactor intake (Ca, Mg, Vitamin K2, Omega-3, etc)

see wikipage: http://www.vitamindwiki.com/tiki-index.php?page_id=1293

Consensus: 0 ng is bad and 30 ng is good/ok

Vitamin D Council - Dr. Cannell

Summarized below

  1. 40-60 ng: Chimpanzees
  2. 40-60 ng: Lifeguards or other people outdoors with minimal clothes
  3. 40-60 ng: Needed to have vitamin D in breast milk
  4. >40 ng: Body starts to store vitamin D – for use in the first portion of winter
    Note: Vitamin D from the sun is stored in the body longer than vitamin D from supplements

At VitaminDWiki - need 20 - 49 ng

At VitaminDWiki - 50 - 60 ng

At VitaminDWiki - need > 60 ng

At VitaminDWiki - Optimal/Treatment

At VitaminDWiki - other


Some indications that >40 or >50 ng may sometimes cause some problems



Agreement: 50 ng is NOT TOXIC

U Shaped curve due to long follow-up time, not latitude - by Dr. Grant

The U-shaped relationship comes only from prospective studies with long follow-up times.
In my considered opinion, it is an artifact of the long follow-up time, not high latitude.

References (some of which are in VitaminDWiki)

  • Robien K, Cutler GJ, Lazovich D. Vitamin D intake and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women: the Iowa Women's Health Study. Cancer Causes Control. 2007 Sep;18(7):775-82.
  • Lim U, Freedman DM, Hollis BW, Horst RL, Purdue MP, Chatterjee N, Weinstein SJ, Morton LM, Schatzkin A, Virtamo J, Linet MS, Hartge P, Albanes D. A prospective investigation of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and risk of lymphoid cancers. Int J Cancer. 2009 Feb 15;124(4):979-86.
  • Grant WB. Effect of interval between serum draw and follow-up period on relative risk of cancer incidence with respect to 25-hydroxyvitamin D level; implications for meta-analyses and setting vitamin D guidelines, Dermato- Endocrinology, 2011 July, Aug Sept.;3(3) epub (lag) http://www.landesbioscience.com/journals/dermatoendocrinology/article/15364/
  • Grant WB. Additional strong evidence that optimal serum 25(OH)D levels are at least 75 nmol/l. Int J Epi 2011 40: 1005-1007.

Do people with Dark Skin have a lower need for vitamin D? - Controversy

Chart of Vitamin D levels vs race - April 2013


Populations with more than 50 ng of vitamin D

How to Get Your Vitamin D Within to Healthy Ranges Mercola Nov 2011


A home test kit for excess Calcium in the urine is available $10 for 10 tests

See also web

Note: need to also search for: 100 nmol, 125 nmol, 150 nmol, 200 nmol

See also web - vitamin D test "reference range"

Papers with Optimal or Optimum "Vitamin D" in PubMed

short URL = http://is.gd/Dlevels

Page visited 19663 times. Last modified 23 September, 2016 . URL:
Print Printer Friendly PDF PDF this page! Follow this page for updates Follow this page for updates.
List of attached files
ID Name desc uploaded Size Downloads Actions
3228 jpg PubMed Optimal.jpg 09 Nov., 2013 by admin 9.11 Kb 5751 View Download  
2898 jpg Mercola Optimal.jpg 12 Aug., 2013 by admin 21.97 Kb 4706 View Download  
See any problem with this page? Report it to the webmaster.